Thursday, May 6, 2010
Saturday, May 1, 2010
A new Idea
Hey guys! It's been a while since I last posted anything. Sorry about that.
This post is to inform you guys that I have decided to introduce something new today: Weekly insights on what's happening in my life. Something like what the Straits Times does, the 'One Week in Singapore" cartoon column.
AND... You're MOST WELCOME to comment on them, so yea, stay tuned =D
Friday, April 30, 2010
Singapore Considering Nuclear Energy
SINGAPORE IS considering going into nuclear energy. They will be holding a convention sometime in June to discuss this issue. However, the kind of power plant to be built would most likely not be the huge scale ones you see on TV. It would most probably be a smaller-scale reactor currently in its testing stage in Japan. These kind of reactors are more suited for countries like Singapore, and for operating underground.
This is a start for Singapore, as we are finally looking into nuclear energy. Nuclear energy, like everything else, has, of course, its advantages and disadvantages.
One advantage of having a nuclear power plant here in Singapore is that we can reduce our reliance on other countries for electricity. We would not be affected, or at least too affected, by power outages happening in, for example, Indonesia.
However, with advantages always comes disadvantages. Nuclear waste is not easy to dispose of. The waste have to be stored in large cement containers and buried underground for millions of years as radiation lives for a very long time. This reduces the amount of land available for use.
Another bane of nuclear is that, if not operated carefully, nuclear is potentially fatal. Take for example the case of the Chernobyl disaster in Russia.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Killer Litter
This post was made after one of my cousins was hit by an egg from above. This was definitely on purpose, as my uncle had noticed a broken charcoal had hit the ground near him. Let me give a summary of what happened:
My six cousins and I were playing 'monkey' in a mini amphitheatre near the void deck. My uncle joined us slightly later.
My uncle was sitting down watching us play when he heard something crack near him, and found 4 broken pieces of charcoal. He went around trying to find out who was the culprit, but to no avail. Note that he did not inform us.
Subsequently, an egg landed on one of my cousin's left shoulder, and an egg shell grazed her neck and created a mess on the floor. My uncle immediately went to the nearby (and it was VERY near) police post to report the incident. The officer on duty told him that his colleagues would be coming over shortly. While waiting for the officers to arrive, we started on our own investigations. Our investigations found that the 8 floor corridor was the only floor which had charcoal.
When the officers did arrive, it was around TWENTY MINUTES LATER. By that time my cousin had already gone back up to change into a new set of clothes and returned! The officers merely took down my uncle's and my affected cousin's statements, and left without even making an inspection!
I would like to ask: What are our police doing? How are they going to solve crimes like this, or are they even going to bother solving it at all? The police should at least attempt to find the culprit, and not let these CRIMINALS escape unpunished!
Although I recognise that this would not be easy, but they should at least have put in some effort in trying to solve it, like narrowing down their searches to households which have charcoal and eggs, instead of coming to scene talking on the phone and leaving after taking down statements.
Fortunately what the CRIMINAL (I choose to call him/her that) has thrown was an egg, and not something more solid like a rock. The person might have been irritated by the noise that we were generating, but s/he could have at least told us, instead of throwing things down from high-rise buildings.
After this incident, we were afraid to play in the amphitheatre again, and stuck to playing in the playground. And if we did play in the amphitheatre, we would ensure that the block where the suspected culprit was was videoed (of course the camera was quite hidden).
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Mrs Henry Lafayette Dubose's Obituary

Image of old lady obtained from http://www.travisjensensf.com/blogs/posts/Travis-Jensen-Blog*
I know that is not very fantastic photoshopping skills, but well, that is the best I can do.
*No infringement of copyright intended
An Interview on Prejudice & Discrimination
An interview on prejudice and discrimination was conducted with Mr Liaw Jun Xian over Instant Messaging on 2 March. Mr Liaw is a colleague of my mother.
Below is the transcript of the interview.
**********************************************
Me: Good morning Mr Liaw. Thank you for granting me this interview. May I have your opinion on prejudice and discrimination?
Mr Liaw: Prejudice and discrimination are both very wide topics. Prejudice is a pre-disposition of a person versus a certain topic/subject/person.
Me: Well, how about towards the racism side?
Mr Liaw: Racial prejudice?
Me: Well, yes, since this assignment is based on the themes in To Kill A Mockingbird.
Mr Liaw: I think it is dependent on cultural differences. Like in the book, it is because the Negroes have always been view to be lower class, hence the pre-disposition of society is always prejudiced.
Same as for example in SIngapore, when mothers discipline their kids. They always say, "Wait Mankali come and catch you."
So mainly I feel this kind of prejudice is created by two factors. First, the societal archetype between cultures due to a lack of understanding and also the propagation and reinforcement of such behaviour by parents. Another example (which is very prevalent in your school), because there are only a small number of Malays, people who graduate from your school has the prejudice that Malays are lazy. Don't ask me why though.
Anyway, back to the topic. Discrimination and prejudice have a thin line. What do you think discrimination is?
Me: Yes, I agree that is is very difficult to differentiate between them. In my opinion, I feel that discrimination is like differentiating someone from another by say, their race.
Mr Liaw: Differentiating is a very neutral word. What is the difference between discrimination and identity then? I can say "I am Chinese." Is that discriminatory? It is not.
Me: Oh no. What I meant is like, you would not want to hang out with a person because of his/her ethnic group.
Mr Liaw: Correct. In a way, I think prejudice and discrimination have a cause-and-effect relationship. Because you are prejudiced against someone or something, you discriminate against him/it, so therefore discrimination is the action, like in your example. If you discriminate someone, you would 'criminalise' him.
Me: Yes, in a way.
Mr Liaw: It is the assumption of guilt in getting the facts right, simply because you are prejudiced.
Me: So what do you think can be done to stop them (prejudice and discrimination)?
Mr Liaw: I think the only way to stop them is via an open mind and more understanding.
Me: Yes, I do agree.
Mr Liaw: So these are my thoughts on them. Anything else?
Me: No. Thank you Mr Liaw once again.
**********************************************
Note: Some parts of this interview have been edited.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Home Learning Day 5
THE OPENING OF TWO I.R.s IN SINGAPORE
Everyone should already have known that Singapore is currently building the two Integrated Resorts (I.R.s), Resorts World at Sentosa and Marina Bay Sands Resort & Casino, with the former slated to be open in early 2010.
The opening of these two I.Rs will bring a number of benefits to both Singaporeans and nearby countries alike. There will be a shopping paradise in the Marina Bay Sands Resort, a one hectare Sands SkyPark™, a casino and many more features not seen in Singapore. They have also offered over 1000 jobs for Singaporeans. In the Resorts World at Sentosa, there will be Universal Studios Singapore®, which most probably will attract both Singaporeans and tourists within an 8-hour flight range from Singapore, and of course a casino and hotels.
With so many benefits, why are people against the idea?
Well, with compulsive gambling already a social problem in Singapore, wouldn't the opening of TWO casinos make the situation worse?
Yes, the Government has started to crackdown on illegal moneylenders and have allowed families to prevent their kin from entering the casinos. Counselling centres have been set-up too.
But with all these measures in place, do you think that the problem of compulsive gambling can be curbed? I do not think so.
A psychologist, Paul Good, said that the people 20 years ago gambled to escape from their everyday lives, but now they are simple lured by the action. "A sense of excitement, of being on the edge, and you are literally holding your own fate in your own hands at a poker table."
Three women in treatment for compulsive gambling have also relapsed at least once.
Everyone should already have known that Singapore is currently building the two Integrated Resorts (I.R.s), Resorts World at Sentosa and Marina Bay Sands Resort & Casino, with the former slated to be open in early 2010.
The opening of these two I.Rs will bring a number of benefits to both Singaporeans and nearby countries alike. There will be a shopping paradise in the Marina Bay Sands Resort, a one hectare Sands SkyPark™, a casino and many more features not seen in Singapore. They have also offered over 1000 jobs for Singaporeans. In the Resorts World at Sentosa, there will be Universal Studios Singapore®, which most probably will attract both Singaporeans and tourists within an 8-hour flight range from Singapore, and of course a casino and hotels.
With so many benefits, why are people against the idea?
Well, with compulsive gambling already a social problem in Singapore, wouldn't the opening of TWO casinos make the situation worse?
Yes, the Government has started to crackdown on illegal moneylenders and have allowed families to prevent their kin from entering the casinos. Counselling centres have been set-up too.
But with all these measures in place, do you think that the problem of compulsive gambling can be curbed? I do not think so.
A psychologist, Paul Good, said that the people 20 years ago gambled to escape from their everyday lives, but now they are simple lured by the action. "A sense of excitement, of being on the edge, and you are literally holding your own fate in your own hands at a poker table."
Three women in treatment for compulsive gambling have also relapsed at least once.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)